The demographics are different for anarchs, but it's the same shit/worse, especially since, y'know, the Anarchs aren't meant to be championing humanity, they're supposedly championing freedom, and if that freedom means The Path of Night, Bones, Caine, Lilith, Typhon, Blood. 'The Movement' doesn't tell them to screw up, they do that on their own.
It's the same thing with the Anarchs, really. Anything else is just inviting instability and a counter revolution. The Anarchs are Satisfied and become full fledged members of the Camarilla. Your Baron becomes Prince or you set up a ruling council, and you make the changes you want to make. Imo, most "happy endings" for Anarchs should be the reformation of the local Camarilla, with all members accepting the new status quo. (Of course V5 seems to be retconning paths to a Sabbat only thing, but in any case. Then it means you're going to have some particularly Immoral members among the ranks. "The Movement" doesn't tell them to screw up, they do that on their own. If anything, the Cam does well to curb the absolute worst excesses of princes, because it's the only sect that champions humanity (if only for the sake of the Masquerade) It's not actually the Camarilla as a body telling princes to be evil and tyranical. When the Camarilla is being cruel, 90% of the time that's the Prince, the council, or the puppetmaster acting in the name of the Camarilla.
0 kommentar(er)
